The Elite Players desire to rule the world with their One World Government. Pat Buchanan explains how the America most adults grew up in is fast disappearing. Americans resent the dictatorial, undemocratic way that elitists in the media, academia, the bureaucracy, and the courts have spit on the foundations of our culture.
Those elite opinion sources have carried on a war against our Judeo-Christian faith, traditional marriage, and our patriotic belief that America is exceptional and should be militarily superior. They have trashed and tried to abolish symbols we cherish such as the Pledge of Allegiance, the Ten Commandments, and a cross erected in a public place to honor our veterans.
Those same elitists, using the power of government, have destroyed the economic stability of the family by legalizing unilateral divorce, giving enormous taxpayer subsidies to single moms which discriminate against marriage, adopting so-called free-trade policies that shipped millions of good jobs overseas, importing millions of foreigners from Third World countries to take the remaining jobs away from Americans, and enforcing so-called affirmative action policies that discriminate against white men. They are replacing e pluribus unum with what Theodore Roosevelt warned against: unrestrained immigration that will make us “a ‘polyglot boarding house‘ for the world.”
Buchanan is eloquent in describing the coordinated attack on Christian America and its replacement with the new religion of diversity, using the language of political correctness. Equality, a French-Revolution word that does not appear in any of America’s founding documents, has been elevated to become our national goal instead of liberty.
Buchanan cherishes the hope that our political leaders will, in time, recognize that enough Americans still want to remain one nation under God and one people united by history, heritage and language. He gives specific suggestions for how we can avoid driving off the cliff into national suicide.
Government choosing winners and losers is never a good idea.
In order for a government to grow so they keep their base happy they need the support of business. Government choosing an industry, will regulate new rules or laws to favor that industry. The industry will then reap the rewards of that legislation by producing products the government, not the consumer wants. The government will force the product on the consumer without validating its function, scientific data or financial feasibility. The government will subsidize the product with grants or subsidies. The competition will go out of business because they will not get the rewards of those subsidies and their prices will be higher. The company will then subsidize the government with donations to the candidate making the regulations. Do the people making the regulations benefit? You decide.
Communists legislate so their favored industry can continually feed their propaganda machine.
Guide to the Political Left, connect the dots: Discover the networks
In its report published in 1954, the Reece Committee (the Special House Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations) explained and quoted the official minutes of the Board of Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace [See also:Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution]
“These trustees in a meeting about 1917 had the brashness to congratulate themselves on the wisdom of their original decision because already the impact of war had indicated it… could alter life in this country. … they even had the brashness to … dispatch a telegram to Mr. Wilson, cautioning him to see that the war did not end too quickly…. “The concern became, as expressed by the trustees, seeing to it that there was no reversion to life in this country as it existed prior to 1914. And they came to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, they must control education. and then they approached the Rockefeller Foundation and they said, ‘Will you take on the acquisition of control of education as it involves subjects that re domestic in their significance? We’ll take on the basis of subjects that have an international significance..’ And it was agreed…. They decided the key to is the teaching of American history, and they must change that.” [The Tax-Exempt Foundations, p. 60-61]
George W H Bush told us: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g .
Read Bush’s speech. http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0900156.html
Clinton marched forward with his Presidents Council on Sustainable Development, NAFTA, Repeal of Glass Stegal and the Community Redevelopmant Act while promoting Sustainable America polices.
George W Bush continued to destroy the schools with NCLB. He kept our borders open for the North American Trans corridor and moved forward with regionalism where we have no borders. All this is fact.
Obama implemented Agenda 21 by appointing communists as czars and destroying education with Race to the Top. Let see who these communists are:
Communists in congress- Follow the links to their bios…
The US Senate has been infiltrated by Marxists and socialists for decades. Despite being highly influential, and with access to many state secrets, many of them are outright security risks.
Some prime recent examples include James Abourezk (D-SD), Mark Dayton (D-MN), (now Governor of Minnesota), Howard Metzenbaum (D-OH), Alan Cranston (D-CA), Ted Kennedy (D-MA), Dick Lugar (R-IN), Carol Moseley Braun (D-IL), Barack Obama (D-IL), and of course both Obama Secretary of State picks Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and John Kerry (D-MA).
Some of the worst of those remaining include newbies Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) – my sympathies Massachusetts, and Barbara Boxer, (D-CA), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Dick Durbin, (D-IL), Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), Al Franken (D-MN), Iowa’s thankfully retiring Tom Harkin (D) and of course Vermont’s veteran “Independent” Marxist Bernie Sanders.
Is there a communist living in the White House? Victoria Jackson thinks so.
Industrialized countries [Americans] have “developed and benefited from the unsustainable patterns of production and consumption which have produced our present dilemma. It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption pattern of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning and suburban housing – are not sustainable. A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmentally damaging consumption patterns.” Strong also explains in an essay that the concept of sovereignty has to yield in favor of the “new imperatives of global environmental cooperative.”
The Elite always meet under the cover of darkness and secrecy. Only evil plans are created in darkness. “We are on the verge of a global transformation, all we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept a New World Order.” David Rockerfeller and so Man Made Global Warming was created by Man to control Man. Read: Club Bilderberg by Daniel Estulin. Evolution by Stealth. Foreigners will be recruited into the military in order to suppress the domestic population.
George Soros, One Evil Man (922)
Obama is linked to radical communist Saul Alinsky
The goal is to reduce the world population to approximately 500,000. Both sides of all wars are supported by the Elite. Mass murder is supported by the Elite. “The death of 1 is a tragedy, the death of the masses is a statistic.” Josef Stalin
Stalin: Starvation, 40million people
Hitler: Trying to create the perfect race for the Elite, 22 million dead
Mao: Secretly Supported against Nationalist China, 60 million dead
“Whatever the price of the communist revolution in China, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in History.” David Rockerfeller
Vice President Joe Biden has no problem with the government forcibly sterilizing people and compelling abortions. From his remarks at Sichuan University in Chengdu, China yesterday discussing the U.S. debt.
|AP Protects Obama While Attacking Conservative FilmPosted: 29 Aug 2012 02:41 PM PDT
By: Cliff Kincaid
The AP is one of the most influential news organizations in the world. Her article is running in literally hundreds of papers here and abroad and conveys the impression that D’Souza, a popular conservative author and scholar, and president of a Christian college, is deliberately misleading the public and distorting the facts about Obama’s background and history.
However, Fouhy completely ignores the part of the film that features an interview with Professor Paul Kengor, an accomplished author who discusses Obama’s mentor in Hawaii, Communist Party member and writer Frank Marshall Davis. This is the relationship that the media continue to regard as taboo. The failure to talk truthfully about Davis, identified merely as “Frank” in Obama’s memoir, constitutes one of the most important and insidious cover-ups in presidential history.
Exhibiting her service to the Obama campaign, Fouhy doesn’t want to blow the lid off this scandal and clearly prefers that the cover-up continue. Her movie “review,” as such, appears to be designed to warn people not to take any critics of Obama seriously when they raise questions about his foreign connections.
However, she knows that the truth is available because it was in the film that she supposedly saw. She cannot refute it. Obama was heavily influenced by a member of a Communist Party controlled and funded by Moscow. Frank Marshall Davis was even a supporter of mass murderer Joseph Stalin.
As AIM has documented, D’Souza in his film and book claims that “anti-colonialism” is behind Obama’s beliefs and policies. But anti-colonialism was a tactic of the international communist movement, which attempted to create the Soviet Union’s own colonial empire.
AIM has argued that Obama’s Marxist connection is far more newsworthy and significant than whatever “anti-colonial” views he may have had. Communist parties that engage in subversion and espionage against the United States, and use agents of influence to manipulate U.S. policy, still exist and operate against the United States, sometimes in collaboration with Islamist movements.
A communist writer by the name of Frank Chapman once referred to Obama himself as a revolutionary mole, while Marxist historian Gerald Horne spoke of Obama being influenced by Frank Marshall Davis during an event at the Tamiment Library in New York where the archives of the Communist Party were put on display. These remarks were delivered on March 23, 2007, and published on April 6, 2007�more than five years ago.
Fouhy, an AP political reporter covering the 2012 presidential campaign, has written her review, “Fact Check: ‘Anti-colonial’ Obama not plausible,” in a way that suggests she has ascertained the ultimate truth about the film and Obama. This is laughable. She blatantly ignores the facts about Davis mentioned in the film.
Focusing on the movie’s faulty claims of Obama’s anti-colonialism, Fouhy writes, “�it’s difficult to see hoow Obama’s political leanings could have been so directly shaped by his father, as D’Souza claims. The elder Obama left his wife and young son, the future president, when Obama was 2 and visited his son only once, when Obama was 10. But D’Souza portrays that loss as an event that reinforced rather than weakened the president’s ties to his father, who died in an automobile accident when Obama was in college.”
She is correct that there is no hard evidence the Kenyan, who may not in fact have been Obama’s real father, had any significant influence over Obama.
However, Fouhy ignores the fact that D’Souza attempts to make up for this deficiency in his film by including the interview with Cold War historian Paul Kengor, who had access to Davis’s 600-page FBI file and his writings for Communist Party papers. His new book is THE COMMUNIST Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor. Davis guided Obama’s thinking for about eight years in Hawaii, before Obama went off to Occidental College. Obama’s classmate John Drew says Obama was a Marxist at that time.
Kengor makes the well-documented assertion that it was Davis who most heavily influenced Obama as he was growing up in Hawaii. The interview with Kengor in the D’Souza film, which is showing in hundreds of theaters, gets on the record many of the long-neglected facts about Obama’s relationship with a communist.
While D’Souza’s film is flawed in terms of the anti-colonialism angle, Fouhy’s strange omission of the Davis matter makes her review even more questionable. D’Souza at least included the Kengor interview, which seems to represent his awareness that there is an alternative view of how Obama turned out that is more consistent with the facts as we have come to know and appreciate them.
The Fouhy review is the latest in a series of examples of how the major media have refused to address the facts, known by them for more than four years, about how Obama was influenced by a key member of the Communist Party member in Hawaii, and how Obama and his campaign tried to cover it up.
Four years ago, AP ran a story about Davis without mentioning the smoking-gun evidence that Davis was a Communist Party member. AP then called Davis a “left-leaning black journalist and poet” known for “leftist politics” and someone who might be accused by some of having “allegedly anti-American views.”
Fouhy could have set the record straight, by citing the Kengor interview in the D’Souza film, and she could have written about the 600-page FBI file on Davis. But she decided not to. Perhaps she realized that the facts about Davis and Obama are not in dispute and that her best approach was simply to ignore them. This is not real “fact-checking,” but dishonest journalism designed to guarantee a second term for Obama.
Cliff Kincaid is the Director of the AIM Center for Investigative Journalism and can be contacted at email@example.com.
|MSNBC Fears Romney has White AppealPosted: 29 Aug 2012 02:13 PM PDT
By: Cliff Kincaid
Citing polling data that blacks and Hispanics are going for Obama, Maddow said on her August 24 show, “Mitt Romney`s only hope now is to win over white voters by a very large margin.” Maddow went on to say that she believes this is why Romney made a joke about Obama’s birth certificate. She made it clear that, in her mind, this was an unacceptable way to campaign and win votes.
Jared Taylor, who runs the organization American Renaissance, comments, “Rachel Maddow wonders whether Mitt Romney is trying to get ‘the white vote.’ What an idea! Everyone tries to cultivate blacks, Hispanics, and even Asians, but wouldn’t it be ‘racist’ to cultivate the white vote? Actually, because they cast 76.3 percent of the votes in the 2008 election, anything that shifts even one or two percent of whites your way is worth doing.”
Taylor told AIM, “Hispanics were only 7.4 percent of the electorate [in 2008], so getting just one percent more of whites to vote for you is like getting 10 percent more Hispanics. If you were Romney, where would you concentrate your efforts?”
The Obama campaign has run a 60-second ad, entitled “We’ve Got Your Back,” appealing to black voters’ nostalgia about the election of the nation’s first African-American president, calling for those voters to “have the President’s back” and stand with Obama again in November.
A black voter commented on the website where the ad is posted: “I am black and I think if Mitt Romney made an ad targeting white people that would be considered racist, but Obama can target blacks and it is not? Ridiculous.”
None of this is worthy of condemnation from the liberal commentators at MSNBC.
Jared Taylor, author of the book, White Identity, has been banned from most programs because he dares to talk about whites as people with special interests of their own, separate from various minority groups. “Only whites must always act as individuals and never as members of a group that promotes shared interests,” he notes in his book, in commenting on the politically correct mindset that prevails on racial matters in America.
The Southern Poverty Law Center, the far-left group that is said to have inspired the violent homosexual to open fire on the Washington office of the Family Research Council, has smeared Taylor as a “white nationalist.”
On her program, Maddow noted that an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll showed Romney with zero percent of the African-American electorate and losing to Obama among Latinos by a 35-point margin. These lop-sided margins were not considered in any way racial by Maddow. Instead, she viewed them as an expression of legitimate political interests.
The idea of zero percentage of blacks voting for Romney didn’t strike Maddow as racist in any way.
But the notion that white people would vote for Romney, and that he would try to win their votes, was something that she rejected as improper and completely out of bounds.
She asked, “Why would he make a birther joke on the way to the Republican National Convention? Does the Romney campaign think there is an upside here? Do they think it helps them if they somehow reward and comfort and proverbially clap on the shoulder anyone who is the kind of person who still holds a deep-seated feeling that this man should not be an American president? That there`s something illegitimate and un-American about this man being in charge of the government?”
The “birther” joke is not necessarily racial, however, and refers to a belief by many that Obama has not been honest about his family background, the circumstances surrounding his birth, and his history.
Obama, like Romney, has joked about his place of birth, but many conservatives do not regard it as a laughing matter. Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpiao has documented anomalies in Obama’s birth certificate, including in the category identifying his father as being from Africa, while Breitbart.com revealed that Obama himself claimed a Kenyan birth in promotional material that his literary agent sent to prospective publishers.
In another strange twist in Obama’s life story, Professor Paul Kengor says that the audio version of Obama’s book Dreams from My Father eliminates references to “Frank” as Obama’s mentor. “Frank” was how Obama referred to Communist Party operative Frank Marshall Davis in his book.
As Rusty Weiss and I wrote in the AIM report, “Reason to Hate: Barack Obama’s Racist Roots,” Davis was a black racist who saw sinister white plots in the foreign policies of the United States and other Western nations. He had a decisive influence over Obama during his growing-up years in Hawaii and told him that “black people have reason to hate.”
Cliff Kincaid is the Director of the AIM Center for Investigative Journalism and can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org.
|Weekly Featured Profile – Valerie JarrettPosted: 29 Aug 2012 10:14 AM PDT